How the rise of a megawatts solar PV farms shows us the future of energy
California has one of the most aggressive mandates in the U.S. — called the Renewable Portfolio Standard — and it sets a legal standard that utilities in the state have to deliver 33 percent of their electricity from clean power sources by 2020. It was first established in 2002 via Senate Bill 1078, and strengthened in 2006 and 2011.
That means that over the past decade California’s utilities have been struggling and experimenting with tactics to meet this expectation. They’re figuring it out: the state’s three largest investor-owned utilities (PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E) are getting there and hit an average of 22.7 percent clean power as of 2013. And expect the RPS to keep going up. In his inaugural address in January, California’s newly re-elected Governor Jerry Brown called for an increase in the mandate to 50 percent clean power for electricity by 2030.
Large solar panel farms are now one of the most viable ways for utilities to meet big chunks of the RPS. Wind farms are another option, but windy regions can be harder to come by and many of the best areas have been maxed out with wind turbines already. In Europe, power companies are investing in offshore wind farms, but these have mostly stalled in the U.S.
There are a variety of factors that have made solar panel farms one of the best choices for clean power for the electricity grid. Due to a combination of federal incentives, private markets, and a decade of lowering technology costs, right now you can build a large utility-scale solar panel farm in the U.S. for the cheapest price in history: as low as $1.68 a watt, according to GTM Research.
That price is competitive with the cost of building a new natural gas plant. A utility-scale solar power plant can deliver electricity for between 7 to 9 cents per kilowatt hour, excluding subsidies. The largest new sources of electricity generation in the U.S. are coming from natural gas plants, and efficient new natural gas plants can deliver power for between 6 and 12 cents per kilowatt hour. (PG&E reportedly originally signed the Topaz deal for 20 cents per kilowatt hour in 2008).
Building utility-scale solar panel plants is cheaper per watt than installing large rooftop solar systems for companies and organizations, which cost about $2.27 a watt, and it’s far cheaper per watt than installing solar panels on the roofs of homes, which cost around $3.60 a watt, according to GTM Research. Much of the costs associated with solar panel projects don’t come from the cost of the panels themselves, but everything else involved. (See the blended average installation costs per watt below from SEIA).
The new economics associated with solar panel farms comes in part from the bare-bones costs of the solar panels these days. The technology has truly become a commodity, just like the semiconductor chip. Huge solar manufacturers in China, Japan, and the U.S. are making these panels in massive volumes, and in recent years they’ve even struggled to make a profit because solar panel costs had dropped so low (though that crunch has lately started to turn into a manufacturing boom).
Because solar panels have become a commodity, large institutions and banks are now willing to invest in solar farms and rooftop solar projects the way they have invested in traditional energy technologies. Solar farms are now “bankable,” and they can provide reliable returns to investors. Warren Buffett, whose investment firm owns a subsidiary that owns Topaz, is just the most high profile investor to be bullish on the money-making potential of solar farms.
As the price of solar panel projects started to fall in recent years, the U.S. federal government has also stepped in to help provide incentives. The federal investment tax credit (ITC) is a big one, and it delivers a 30 percent tax credit to solar project developers. The ITC has been so important for utility-scale solar development that the threat of the ITC shrinking at the end of 2016 could significantly jeopardize the development of these projects. Analysts like GTM Research’s Shayle Kann predict if the ITC is reduced (it’s due to expire at the end of 2016 but could be extended), it will make these types of utility solar projects uncompetitive with new natural gas projects.
The federal government also provided loan guarantees, backing big loans for some of the first large solar panel farms like Desert Sunlight (but not Topaz). So federal incentives helped some of these first large solar farms access lower costs of capital. The U.S. Secretary of Energy, Ernie Moniz, told me late last year that providing loan guarantees for these early solar panel farms was exactly what the loan program was designed to do and these early farms are a very successful example of how the government can help clean power technology.
In essence, the federal guarantees helped a technology that was on the cusp of economic viability become viable, Moniz explained. But now that solar panels are even cheaper than they were back then (the loan guarantee for Desert Sunlight was finalized in 2011), the DOE won’t likely provide a loan guarantee on this scale for a new utility-scale solar farm, he said.
Combined with the new lows in panel prices, utilities can also find solar panel deals attractive because they can buy the power from these solar farms at a fixed rate over 25 years or so. That means if the price of natural gas or other energy resources all of a sudden shoots up, the utilities know that they have a fixed deal for at least part of their electricity source. Large solar panel farms have some of the most reliable and predictable costs, because after the initial investment the source of the electricity (the sun) is static and free.
Until recently, conventional wisdom held that utilities would find a big chunk of the solar capacity they sought in solar thermal plants (sometimes called concentrating solar farms). These farms use mirrors to concentrate the sun’s rays to heat liquid to run steam turbines. But as the price of solar panels dropped over the years, these solar thermal sites have increasingly been replaced with plans for solar panel farms.
Looking back at Topaz
If you go back seven years and look at the early inklings that became Topaz, a small part of the project was originally intended for one of these mirror-laden solar thermal farms. But a much bigger part of Topaz was once under development in 2008 by a fly-by-night solar startup whose big idea was to manufacture its own solar panels at a massive scale using off-the-shelf technology but production lessons from the computing and chip industries.
Cleantech old-timers will remember OptiSolar, which was one of the first cleantech boom-and-bust startups that suggested there might be a lot of difficulties ahead for capital-intensive, manufacturing-focused energy startups. The company, founded in 2005 by HP scientist Marvin Keshner and Rajiv Arya, had a goal of making solar panels for $1 a watt using amorphous silicon (an older technology), and using manufacturing ideas from a paper published by NREL.
The company managed to raise hundreds of millions of dollars from private equity investors, and even back then — when the Valley was going crazy over cleantech deals — the cleantech-focused VCs of Silicon Valley weren’t involved with the firm. But the deal was representative of the type of investments that were being done at the time in the Valley. Solar manufacturing startups Solyndra, Miasole, and Nanosolar all raised hundreds of millions of dollars from VCs starting around this time.
In early 2008 OptiSolar announced it was developing a 550 MW solar farm dubbed Topaz, and it planned to build the project with its own installer subsidiary, called Topaz Solar. At that time, California utilities didn’t really know how they were going to meet the newly-strengthened legal mandates in such a short time frame, and some of their early deals (space solar?) were questionable. In 2008, PG&E surprised the world by announcing it had struck a deal with OptiSolar to buy the power from the Topaz Solar farm.
At one point OptiSolar was supposed to employ 1,000 workers to make 600 MW worth of solar panels a year at its factory in Sacramento County, and the factory’s ribbon-cutting ceremony was attended by then-California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. But the company had outsized ambitions, a questionable plan, and truly unfortunate timing. The credit crunch took the wind out of the sails of most of the financing needed to execute on such an ambitious project. The same financial downturn also almost killed then-young Tesla Motors during this time.
Just a year later, OptiSolar laid off half of its staff, halted manufacturing and hawked its “crown jewel” — the Topaz solar project — to First Solar. Around then, First Solar also bought up a cancelled solar thermal project planned by startup Ausra nearby and reconfigured the project layout of Topaz to be what it is today.
Two and a half years later First Solar sold the project to Warren Buffett’s MidAmerican, but retained the panel supply deal. The rest is history, written by the maturation of the solar industry: solar panel prices dropped, and the project slowly got built. The folks behind OptiSolar a few years later tried to resurrect as NovaSolar, but that also later went out of business in 2012.
Solar panel farm future
Today, the state of the solar panel farm industry is a far cry from these high risk days of OptiSolar. And you can expect to see many more of these large solar panel farms to cover many more miles of land in the Southwest, as well as other sunny areas of the U.S. and across the world. Some of the biggest opposition for the biggest utility-scale solar panel farms these days isn’t from technology, economics or risky young startups, but from environmentalists pushing to restrict land use.
These environmental considerations are one reason why these mega solar panel farms might get considerably smaller in the future — there’ll probably be more of them but they’ll have potentially smaller land needs. Smaller solar panel farms — think tens of megawatts instead of hundreds — could be more easily and strategically placed on land that’s already being used by industrial concerns.
The land needs of these mega solar farms are also one reason why some people are more excited about distributed solar panel systems on the rooftops of homes, businesses and organizations, as opposed to these centralized utility-scale solar panels farms. Solar panels on distributed rooftops don’t take up extra land, and can provide electricity specifically for the occupants. These rooftop systems, particularly when paired with a battery, also can provide consumers and organizations a way to basically ditch their utilities, if they feel so inclined.
While rooftop solar systems deliver less solar power than utility solar farms do these days, down the road that could flip and the collective capacity from rooftop solar systems could become substantially larger. When that happens, it will be a challenge for utilities to move from a centralized clean power system to a distributed one, requiring significant investment in their grids.
No matter what it looks like, and where solar panels end up, the sun will increasingly provide for the world’s energy needs, as we look to transition away from carbon-emitting fossil fuel power. As Scientific American pointed out in an issue dedicated to solar in 2013:
Solar is the most abundant energy resource on planet Earth. Even after accounting for weather variation, the average solar power received by the continents alone peaks at 23 million gigawatts. . . It dwarfs all the other renewable energy resources combined—including wind, hydropower and geothermal—and one year’s worth of solar would far exceed the reserves of finite energy resources (nuclear and fossil) even when counting unconventional shale and deep-sea oil and methane.
According to a “grand plan” devised by the magazine in another issue, 69 percent of the electricity in the U.S., and 35 percent of its total energy, could come from centralized solar panel systems by 2050, for a cost of $420 billion between 2011 to 2050. It’s not all that much money if you consider how much the U.S. spends on things like, for example, the Afghanistan war (over $640 billion).
Elon Musk — now famous for being the CEO of Tesla Motors, founder of rocket ship company SpaceX, and the Chairman of SolarCity — told me back in 2008 that by 2030 he thought that solar power will be the single largest source of power in the U.S., and possibly the world. While that might be ambitious in terms of timing, I think we can get there one day.
The Topaz site is really just the start to this sunny revolution. As I arrived back home in San Francisco after my tour of Topaz and the many-hour drive north, the 9 million panels that make up the site will have converted the days sunlight into electricity, pumping substantial carbon-free electricity onto the grid. It might be a small source for PG&E, but for the coming clean power transition, it’s a game-changer.
Updated the last paragraph at 5:54PM on January 21 to correct that the panels at Topaz are at a fixed tilt, and are not on trackers.