Benefits and criticism. Should we support or neglect using rubrics? Evidences from a literature review

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF Benefits and Criticism
Publicado: Jul 1, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v3i2.2891
Palabras clave:
Rubrics, formative assessment,

Contenido principal del artículo

Maha Azmi Dandis
University of Al-Quds

Resumen

Despite their numerous advantages, Rubrics have come under some criticism recently, some of it is reasonable, but much of it is not (Spandel, 2006). This article will spot the light on the rubrics as a formative assessment tool, starting with its definition, its benefits, and finally a debate between its supporters and opponents. In education, we need an ongoing conversation about assessment tools not just in our professional community, but in our classrooms, with students; that key piece of dialogue is all too often overlooked by all of those who extol the rubric’s usefulness or who prophesy the doom it may bring (Gilmore ,2007)

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Azmi Dandis, M. (2014). Benefits and criticism. Should we support or neglect using rubrics? Evidences from a literature review. EDMETIC, 3(2), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v3i2.2891
Número
Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2014): Tendencias y retos de la investigación en Tecnología Educativa
Sección
Artículos

1. Política propuesta para revistas que ofrecen acceso abierto

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
  2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).

2. Política propuesta para revistas que ofrecen acceso abierto diferido

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra [ESPECIFICAR PERIODO DE TIEMPO], el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
  2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).

Bibliografía

ALLEN, D. & TANNER, K. (2006). Rubrics: Tools for Making Learning Goals and Evaluation Criteria Explicit for Both Teachers and Learners. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 5, 197.

ANDRADE , H. (1996). Understanding Rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54 (4).

ANDRADE, H. (2000). Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13.

ANDRADE, H. (2005). Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27.

ANDRADE, H., DU, Y. & WANG, X. (2008). Putting Rubrics to the Test: The Effect of a Model, Criteria Generation, and Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment on Elementary School Students’ Writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3-13.

BEATTY, B. (2008). In Support of scoring Rubric, ITEC 865 E –learning, Erica Rutherford.

BLACK, P. & WILIAM, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Educational assessment: Principles, policy and practice, 5(1), 7-74.

BROOKHART, S., MOSS, C. & LONG, B. (2008). Formative assessment that empowers. Educational Leadership, 66(3).

BUSH, W. & LEINWAND, S. (2000 ).Mathematics Assessment: A Practical Handbook for Grades 6-8. NCTM.

CEBRIAN, M. (2009). Formative and peer-to-peer evaluation using a rubric tool. Reflections and Innovations in Integrating ICT in Education, 60-64.

CEBRIAN, M. & ACCINO, J. (2009). From the e-Portfolio to Federation Technologies: The Agora Virtual® Experience, International Seminars on teaching, research and innovation at University of Malaga.

CHOUDHURY, D. (2012). Rubrics As An Analytical Tool For Indian. Business Schools With Conceptual. Model Using Sem. International Jouranal of Innovative Research & Development, 1(1).

COOPER, B. & GARGAN, A. (2009). Rubrics in education old term, new meanings. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(1), 54.

DEREMER, M. (1998). Writing assessment: Raters’ elaboration of the rating task. Assessing Writing, 5, 7–29.

ESCOLAR, M., RICO, M., AGUDO, E. & PÉREZ, G. (2010). Evaluar para aprender a aprender a través de las rúbricas de evaluación. Las rúbricas de evaluación en el desempeño de competencias: ámbitos de investigación y docencia. International Workshop on «Assessment Rubrics in the Performance of Competences: Research and Teaching Areas.

FLINDERS UNIVERSITY WEBSITE. (2010). What is a rubric, Retrieved from http://www.flinders.edu.au/teaching/teachingstrategies/assessment/grading/rubric.cfm

GATHA, M. & DARCY, P. (2010). rubrics at play, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(6).

HAFNER. J. & HAFNER. P. (2003).Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: an empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12),

JONSSON, A. & SVINGBY, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2 (2), 130.

KAHL, S. (2008). The Assessment of 21st Century Skills: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed. Paper presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers 38th National Conference on Student Assessment, Orlando, FL.

KEEFER, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using, A Peer-Reviewed Electronic Journal, 15(8).

KNIGHT, L (2006). Using rubrics to assess information literacy. Reference Services Review, 34(1), 43.

LEE, E. & LEE, S. (2009). Effects of instructional rubrics on class engagement behaviors and the achievement of lesson objectives by students with mild mental retardation and their typical peers. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(3), 396-408.

LEONHARDT, A. (2005). Using Rubrics as an Assessment Tool in Your Classroom, ERIC EJ760244.

LUFT, J. (1997). Design your own rubric. Science Scope, 20, 25–27.

MARZANO, R., PICKERING, D., & MCTIGHE, J. (1993). Assessing Student Outcomes: Performance Assessment Using the Dimensions of Learning Model. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

MERTLER, C. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25 .

MONTGOMERY, K. (2001). Authentic assessment: A guide for elementary teachers. New York: Longman.

MORA, J. & OCHOA, H. (2010). Rubrics as an evaluation tool in Macroeconomics. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 5 (2), 237–249.

NITKO, A. & BROOKHART, S. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.).

PERLMAN, C. (2003). Performance assessment: Designing appropriate performance tasks and scoring rubrics. In C. Boston (Ed.), Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators. (pp. 497-506). College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.

POPHAM, W. (1997). What’s wrong and what’s write with Rubrics. Educational Leadership, Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development, 55,(2), 72-75

RECO, C. (2011). Diseño e implementación de rúbricas para la evaluación de portafolios digitales, presented at VIII Jornadas Internacionales de Innovación Universitaria. Retrieved from http://celiarico.wordpress.com.

SANTERO, J., FLORES, J. & GORDILLO, J. (2010). El Sistema De Rúbricas: Un Ejemplo Práctico Rubric System: A Practical Example, Las rúbricas de evaluación en el desempeño de competencias: ámbitos de investigación y docencia. International Workshop on Assessment Rubrics in the Performance of Competences: Research and Teaching Areas.

SAUNDERS, K., GLATZ, C., HUBA, M., GRIFFIN, M., MALLAPRAGAD, S. & SHANKS, J. (2003). Using Rubrics to Facilitate Students’ Development of Problem Solving Skills, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from http://www3.cbe.iastate.edu/CRCD/ref/ASEE_PAPER_03.pdf

SHEPARD, L. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching. (pp. 1066-1101). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

SHULMAN, L. (1986).Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching, Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14,

SONG, E. & KOH, K. (2010). Assessment for Learning: Understanding Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. IAEA, Assessment for the future generation, retrieved from http://www.iaea2010.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=111:assessment-for-learning-understanding-teachers-beliefs-and-practices&catid=37:classroom-assessment&Itemid=89

SONIA, L. (2010). El andamiaje en la enseñanza: potencial de las rúbricas y las tutorías.Las rúbricas de evaluación en el desempeño de competencias: ámbitos de investigación y docencia. International Workshop on Assessment Rubrics in the Performance of Competences: Research and Teaching Areas.

SPANDEL, V. (2006). In defense of rubrics. The English Journal, 96(1), 19-22.

STEVENS, D. & LEVI, A.(2005).Introduction to Rubric, An assessment tool to save grading time, Convey effective feedback and promote students learning retrieved on 4-6-2012 at: .http://books.google.es/books?id=LIxWgDn8_N0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

TURLEY, E. & GALLAGHER, C. (2008). On the uses of rubrics: Reframing the great rubric debate. The English Journal, 97(4), 87-92.

WIGGINS, G. (1991). Standards, not standardization: evoking quality student work. Educational Leadership, February, 18–25.

WIGGINS, G., & MCTIGHE, J. (2005). Understanding by Design.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

WILIAM, D. (2008). Improving Learning in Science with Formative Assessment. Assessing Science Learning, proceeds from an NSTA Conference. Retrieved from http://www.nsrconline.org/pdf/H2010_Formative_Assessment.pdf

WILSON, M. (2007). Why I won’t be using rubrics to respond to students’ writing. The English Journal, 96(4), 62-66.

WOLF, K. & STEVENS E. (2007). The Role of Rubrics in Advancing and Assessing Student Learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3-14.

ZIMMERMAN, B. & SCHUNK, D. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from books.google.com.